Supreme Court Nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Presents New Threat to Net Neutrality

10 Mins Read

PUREVPNPrivacy & SecuritySupreme Court Nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Presents New Threat to Net Neutrality

Net Neutrality Rules: Update 10/07/2018

Judge Brett Kavanaugh, considered as a staunch conservative, is the second nominee nominated by the US President Donald Trump for the Supreme Court. There is not just one but many reasons why people fear Kavanaugh taking the helm of the Supreme Court.

For starters, Judge Kavanaugh harbors serious opinions that are clearly hostile to a great number of individuals as well as communities, especially the digital privacy rights activists. For instance, Kavanaugh openly endorses US’s intelligence agency’s metadata retention plan. In fact, Kavanaugh even agrees that monitoring the movement of a suspect’s car via a GPS without a warrant is not a violation of any amendment.

More importantly, Kavanaugh has been a serious opponent of the Obama-era Net Neutrality, deeming the policy as, “unlawful and must be vacated.”

Republicans are voting in favor of Kavanaugh, and if things go in their favor, the US citizens would most probably face more and greater problems in the future.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise but the Net Neutrality rules have officially been repealed after a 6-months long skirmish between the FCC and the opposing forces that not only include private organizations or human rights groups, but also the democrats.

The new rules proposed by Ajit Pai promises, at least on paper, unhampered access to the Internet without any regulatory burdens. In its Press Release, the FCC stated that the repeal removes, “unnecessary, heavy-handed regulations.” The organization further stated in the PR that the repeal replaces the heavy regulations with, “common-sense regulations that will promote investment and broadband deployment.”

Since there will be no rules from today protecting us from problems like content discrimination or hampered browsing/streaming experience, it is now up to us to either live with the unjust rules or pick the right tools to protect our rights and a free Internet.

Finally, a joint committee of 49 Democrats, and surprisingly, a few Republicans (Sens. John Kennedy of Louisiana, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska) have voted to pass a resolution on Wednesday to reverse the FCC’s Net Neutrality repeal, which was proposed by the FCC chairman and backed by the Republicans.

Although it is highly unlikely that President Trump would back the resolution, it is yet a great demonstration of the efforts that Democrats are displaying.

The Democrat Senator, Edward Markey of Massachusetts, said in the resolution debate,

“Today we show the American people who sides with them, and who sides with the powerful special interests and corporate donors who are thriving under this administration.”

He further added,

“The grandparents, the gamers, the gearheads, the geeks, the GIF-makers, the Generations X, Y, and Z. This movement to save net neutrality is made up of every walk of American life.”

It seems, there is still some hope and we need to make one final stand to show our support for Net Neutrality and takedown the controversial repeal decision.

The FCC has finally unveiled the day when the 2015 Net Neutrality rules will be wiped out completely and replaced by the new regulations proposed by the new FCC chairman, Ajit Pai. The day is June 11, 2018.

The date was announced in a press conference on Thursday, May 10.

“Now, on June 11, these unnecessary and harmful Internet regulations will be repealed and the bipartisan, light-touch approach that served the online world well for nearly 20 years will be restored.”

Although the day when the current Internet rules will become invalid has been set by the FCC, it is important to note that some Congress representatives are still fighting the repeal.

Regardless, it is apparent that the hard efforts of the Congress might go in vein because of the overwhelming influence that the FCC has already established.

April 23, 2018, goes down as the day when Obama-era Net Neutrality ruling succumbed to the new rulings led by the Republican-powered Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

Ajit Pai had labeled the 2015 Net Neutrality ruling as “heavy-handed”. Hence, the new FCC chairman proposed a repeal that would, according to him, restore Internet freedom and “boost competition and choice in the broadband marketplace.”

Well, it may mean more money for ISPs and perhaps for the FCC but for the Internet users in the US, it would mean content blocking, slow browsing, and endless buffering.

It is high time to arm our devices with the tool that can help us fight and survive in the post net neutrality repeal era.

The Net Neutrality D-day is finally upon us. Monday, April 23, 2018, is going to be the day when the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally chops down the Obama-era Net Neutrality rules.

Today, it might be the last day for the Internet users in the US to enjoy an open and fair Internet.

After today, it is most likely that Internet users will experience a new Internet, a bad internet. The new Internet will be completely ruled by ISPs having total control on blocking online content and slowing down access to any online content.

However, the FCC won’t get its way without hurdles since the attorney generals of dozens of states have filed lawsuits against the FCC’s vote.

This just might be the final call to come together and protect something we are dearly love!

While you are preparing a delicious turkey for Thanksgiving tomorrow, FCC’s chairman Ajit Pai would be jotting down the details of the roll back of current Net Neutrality rules.

Over the summer, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was bombarded with a whopping 22 million petitions or proposals, both for and against the Net Neutrality repeal. Today is the day when the final revision of the proposal will be released – keeping in view all those proposals – detailing the full order.

For now, we can only cross our fingers and wait for what the FCC chairman has to offer in his proposal before he votes to obliterate Net Neutrality completely by next month, on December 14, 2017.

The “Internet Doomsday” is nigh. Or, not! Nobody is sure what will happen at the end of the net neutrality saga. Unfortunately, for now, the doors of opportunity are closed to raise your voice against the repeal.

The deadline given by FCC to the public to submit their proposals for or against the repeal has passed and we are left awaiting our fate.

In 2014, when the issue of net neutrality first reared its ugly head, it was slaughtered with a whopping 3.7 million petitions. But this time, there has been a record breaking 22 million+ proposals sent to the FCC. Sadly, regardless of its crushing numbers, the FCC chairman, Ajit Pai, has clarified that they won’t take quantity into consideration for the final decision. Instead, they will focus on the quality of the proposal, i.e., the arguments made in them.

The trump administration has signaled that they approve the doings of Federal Communications Commission and its chairman, Ajit Pai, regarding the changes to net neutrality regulations.

Despite the protests that raged on the net neutrality day, the government still supports the FCC’s decision to tamper with the net neutrality rules.

“We support the FCC chair’s efforts to review and consider rolling back these rules,” said deputy White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, “and believe that the best way to get fair rules for everyone is for Congress to take action and create regulatory and economic certainty.”


Net Neutrality is an ongoing issue for the FCC and they have yet to resolve it. The commission had previously expressed its intent of eliminating Net Neutrality entirely from the US. They are already taking steps to grant more power to the ISPs and end Net Neutrality once and for all.

Read more about

What Is Net Neutrality?
Consequences of Anti Net Neutrality Rules?

Thankfully, internet giants are taking FCC’s threats to end Net Neutrality seriously. Most online giants will register their protest against the FCC on July 12 to show their support for Net Neutrality. The participating companies will slow down their services and will display various error messages in an effort to convey what the internet will be like if Net Neutrality is removed from the US.

“No one wants their cable company to control what they can see and do on the Internet or to charge extra fees to access the content they want,” said Evan Greer, the campaign director of Fight for the Future which is a leading organizations behind the protest. “The Internet has given more people a voice than ever before, and that transformative power is worth fighting for. July 12th we will come together to defend the future of free speech.”

Who is participating?

Almost 70,000 individuals, websites, and organizations have signed on to participate in this campaign. These include Twitter, Reddit, Netflix, Amazon, Facebook, Google, Kickstarter, Etsy, Vimeo, Automattic (WordPress), Mozilla, OK Cupid, Imgur, Soundcloud, Medium and hundreds of other major web services.

On July 12, participants will display messages on their homepages supporting Net Neutrality. They’ll also encourage users to take action by sending push notifications, videos, social media messages and emails.

These companies may also slow down their services for a while, or may display fake error messages only to display what will happen if Net Neutrality goes away. Users who face such errors need not to panic. These errors shall only remain for a temporary period and will vanish automatically.

Your time to take action!

We all know the problems we’ll face on a daily basis if the Net Neutrality rules are abolished. The internet will be slower than it ever was, and our online privacy will be at stake. There are plenty of other awful reasons that we’d mentioned earlier below.

It is now time to take action! Raise your voice in support for Net Neutrality. Otherwise, the internet will behave the way its behaving now, but for the rest of your lives.


PREVIOUS UPDATE: FCC Chairman’s plan to roll back net neutrality rules has taken a step forward as the FCC has voted to begin undoing net neutrality rules.

In a 2-to-1 decision, the Federal Communications Commission opened a period of public input which will lead to the final decision. This voting does not immediately undo the 2015 Open Internet Order. For now, the first step to repeal the FCC’s net neutrality rules has been taken and we, the people, will have to raise our voice against it.


The epic battle between net neutrality rules supporters and the Trump-led Federal Communication Commission (FCC) is fueling up once again.

It seems like Ajit Pai, the newly appointed FCC chairman by President Donald Trump, is getting fanatical about abolishing the reforms proposed and established by the previous administration. That’s the reason why the long-debated problem of the open internet is once again brought to light by the new chairman, proposing to reform the rules, thereby “Restoring Internet freedom for all Americans.”

However, the question remains what sort of Internet freedom the new draft is proposing to restore through ending net neutrality. After all, there is no clear explanation in the draft regarding online freedom. The draft only highlights are words such as “spur broadband deployment,” “boost competition and choice in the broadband marketplace,” etc.

What Is Net Neutrality?

To discuss the newly forwarded draft, it is important to first understand what the debate is actually about, i.e., what is net neutrality and how it affects users, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and web companies?

As a user, you want complete access to every sort of applications and websites on the Internet. You want to use your rights of freedom of speech on the Internet without fearing any abrupt shutdown by your ISP. You also want a fast, yet consistent Internet experience.

As an entrepreneur, you want a fair playing field to launch your business, promote your brand and survive in the digital realm. With an open Internet, you can easily achieve your goals of fostering innovation and growth.

All in all, the Internet users in the US want to have complete control over their Internet experience. This is exactly what the net neutrality is all about. Unfortunately, it is probably going to be changed soon due to the newly proposed draft.

Consequences of Anti Net Neutrality Rules!

Due to open internet policies, ISPs are not authorized to restrict any content – unless imposed by the government. Secondly, ISPs are also not allowed to cap or throttle the speed of any website or accept any sort of compensation in exchange of prioritizing speed limit of certain web services over others.

However, with the fair policies of net neutrality gone, you can expect more website or application restrictions imposed by your ISPs. Your network carriers would also have total control on what web services will be assigned to faster lanes and slower lanes.

In short, telecommunication companies would be able to manipulate the Internet speed, i.e., cap or increase traffic to any website or application they want.

Telcos and ISPs are already notorious for manipulating the Internet for their personal gains. Take for instance the well-known case of Comcast back in 2014. The popular network-carrier capped Netflix’s traffic to make them shell out a hefty compensation in exchange for fast streaming on their carrier.

The 2012 case of AT&T is yet another example of ISP monopoly. The ISP restricted a video service application on iPhones, stating that it consumes high bandwidth. However, the fact remains that the AT&T did it because the service was competing with its video service.

National Uproar Against Anti-Net Neutrality Rules

There’s a huge national uproar due to the new net neutrality rules passed by the FCC during the speech by Ajit Pai in May 2017.

Gigi Sohn, the former counselor to the former FCC chairman, foresighted the national outcry by stating, “There will be emails, phone calls, protests ― it’s going to be a tsunami.”

The former counselor also took the Twitter showing complete disagreement over the new rules:

Michael Beckerman, the CEO and President of Internet Association, also issued a statement just hours after the proposed rules regarding net neutrality. In the statement, Michael Beckerman also opposed the new net neutrality policies, reminding the FCC about the importance of current policies and how they affect Internet experience for consumers as well as corporates.

In fact, the founder of the World Wide Web, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, also issued a statement against the rules:

“When I invented the web, I didn’t have to ask anyone for permission, and neither did America’s successful internet entrepreneurs when they started their businesses. To reach its full potential, the internet must remain a permissionless space for creativity, innovation and free expression.”

The concept of anti-net neutrality rules is so distressing that even startups are prepping up to fight it. More than 800 tech startups, including big names like Y Combinatory and Engine Advocacy, sent a letter to Ajit Pai, showing intense disapprovals.

The Best Counter-Measure against the New Net Neutrality Rules

The troubling part is that the new net neutrality policies proposed by Ajit Pai are likely to be approved by the higher-ups. This is because it involves a lot of money.

With the new policies, ISPs and Telcos would be able to rake in more money by prioritizing web services in exchange for a hefty compensation. And when the new rules are implemented, regular Internet users are the ones who will suffer the most.

For starters, users won’t be able to get maximum speed from their favorite web services if the ISP has limited its bandwidth. Secondly, users would also not be able to access content if it is restricted by the ISP.

The ideal solution that can help users survive the anti-net neutrality era is by subscribing to a VPN, virtual private network. A VPN allows users to surf the Internet through an encrypted tunnel. Due to an encrypted connection, even the ISP isn’t able to monitor or inspect the activity of the users on the Internet.

Regarding ISP-imposed content restriction, a VPN also enables users to bypass any ISP or geo restrictions, thereby accessing their favorite contents without any interruption. Apart from enabling users to access geo-restricted content and encryption, a VPN provides a safe and secure Internet experience to the users such as secure emailing, etc.

Net neutrality rules


Sheheryar Khan


June 20, 2023


12 months ago

Sheheryar Ahmed Khan is a privacy enthusiast, currently affiliated with PureVPN. His reporting covers subjects related to online privacy, anonymity, and security. Also a believer in online freedom, Sheheryar likes to spend his free time streaming football matches and TV shows online.

Have Your Say!!

  1. NOC YellowFiber Networks says:

    As a smaller ISP and network service provider in DC, we are 100% on board with you. Net neutrality is good for the industry and for consumers in both the residential and B2B spaces.

  2. Kurt Dittschlag says:

    I can not believe thàt the man elected as our President can not understand there was a reason this internet neutrality law was passed to protect the people. But I guess he is only thinking of a wày to add a few more millions to his accounts.

  3. David Mare says:

    I am inalterably opposed to changing the internet neutrality law and giving greater authority and control to providers and I wish to go on record as opposing this proposed change.

  4. Net Neutral forever says:

    Trump favors big business not the consumer. I voted for the man and am having sleepless nights and stomachs. I did not like the alternatives.. I now find my self praying a lot more…. God help the middle class…
    If de-regulating the IPS makes more money for the ISP then Trump will work for their interests.
    I do not recall his campaign speeches wanting to “protect” the consumer.

    Keep net neutral.

  5. Gery Zengion says:

    I have written my Senators (Casey & Toomey) and my Congressman (Dent) to express my displeasure with the removal of the net neutrality rules. This is not being done for technical reasons, but to dismantle any regulations that were put in place by the Obama administration and to benefit the few at large costs to the people of the United States with complete disregard for our privacy and security.
    Along with healthcare and tax code changes this is something I will be watching and will influence my vote when the gentlemen listed above are coming up for election.

  6. Jeremy says:

    I want unlimited band with at 4g or higher and not have how much I use controlled by carriers and having to pay for it whenbthey say unlimited then after you use say Your 4g then it goes to the slower speed of 3g. That’s not right. I’m on limited income and carriers eat my money with what they are charging now and when I usevmy listed 4g up and have tivuse the slower speed it sucks big time. Plus I hate that if you don’t use there service for viewing something they slow you down. Plus blocked access to web portals I hate too.

  7. dave says:

    useful artcile, thanks

  8. Flori grottoli says:

    Couldn’t have said this any better myself…”I am unalterably opposed to changing the internet neutrality law and giving greater authority and control to providers and I wish to go on record as opposing this proposed change”. Thanks D. Mare!

  9. snakemasterepic says:

    What is to stop the ISPs from blocking connections to VPN servers in a post-net neutrality era?

  10. Wallace says:

    The fake assumption a government can protect the net neutrality is a unicorn. The only way the net neutrality can be a reality is to keep the choice at the consumer level. The role of a government is to protect you individual choices. Not to protect “majority choices” decided by (at least) 50.1% of votes. This is making the difference between freedom and dirigisme. Please stop perpetuate this deadliest confusion.

Join 3 million+ users to embrace internet freedom

Signup for PureVPN to get complete online security and privacy with a hidden IP address and encrypted internet traffic.